Shhhh. It’s “God.”

DEPENDING ON WHO’S reading this, I am about to sound either enlightened or nutty; I don’t really care which, and it doesn’t really matter. (As this blog’s tagline goes, “Those Who Know, Chuckle.”)

One of my favorite rabbis/writers, Jay Michaelson, wrote a book some years ago called Everything is God: The Radical Path of Nondual Judaism. R’ Michaelson’s thesis is that “nonduality” – the idea that everything and everyone is a manifestation of the Divine, rather than G?d being somehow separate from or “above” the physical universe – has as significant a place in Judaism as it does in other mystical traditions (e.g., Vedanta, Sufism, Zen Buddhism, &c).

I began reading this remarkable book a few days ago, and before I had gotten twelve pages in I fired off a fanmail to its author thanking him for having “validated every spiritual experience I have ever had” (if you’re curious, here’s the most profound and lasting one). What makes this book so compelling, at least to me, is R’ Michaelson’s style: matter-of-fact without being “woo-woo,” widely educated but without pretension, and warmly relatable without dumbing down.

Above all, R’ Michaelson emphasizes that the nondual experience can’t be fully described – not because description isn’t allowed, but because isn’t possible. (Or, as he puts it: “In the Jewish tradition, secret traditions are not secret because they are rarely disclosed. They are secret because they are experiential, and thus cannot be disclosed at all.”)

Despite that such experiences don’t lend themselves to words, some teachers make doing so look easy. Rabbi Michaelson is one of those teachers, and Everything is God is one of those books.

Sinchronization (sic), Expanded

A teaching based on an earlier post, which I delivered at our synagogue this past Yom Kippur. If it’s not your bag, may I suggest a little podcast [literally] to chase your blues away?

OF THE MANY metaphors for Yom Kippur, my favorite is a road trip. There are: interesting sights to see, good people to see them with, a killer soundtrack – but no snacks. We’re all on a challenging journey to a distant but familiar destination – a fair and welcoming country called … “Teshuvah.”

Teshuvah is Hebrew for “return.” It’s how Jews make up for our sins – how we wipe them from the whiteboard of our lives, leaving only the lessons they teach us.

But what is a sin, anyway?

Some religions equate the word “sin” with something inherently evil. But the Jewish understanding is rather more nuanced.

Judaism teaches that there are three categories of sinful acts. They’re collectively described as “aveirot” (loosely translated as “line-crossings”):

1. Khet: An archery term for missing the mark, it’s an inattentive or truly ignorant error.

2. Ahvon: A “just this once” or “what’s the harm?” action.

3. Pesha: Knowing what the laws/customs/social contracts require, but deliberately breaking them.

If those distinctions aren’t clear enough, try this driving analogy:

1. Khet: Not paying attention to, or not seeing, a stop sign.

2. Ahvon: Seeing the stop sign, but – not seeing any other drivers – proceeding to drive past it.

3. Pesha: Blowing through the stop sign with a smirking, “they can’t tell ME what to do.”

To extend the metaphor, Yom Kippur may be seen as a reevaluation of our driving habits: brushing up on the California Drivers’ Handbook, say, and plotting our routes to make sure we know how to avoid the known hazards and comply with posted signage.

Why is this important? Because we’re not the only ones on the road! We share the highways and surface streets with other drivers, some of whom have differing behind-the-wheel skills. So to ensure that we all reach our destinations safely, we agree to conduct ourselves accordingly.

Torah, in its broad sense of the entire Jewish textual tradition, is just one example of a drivers’ handbook. It sets out to create a blueprint for a perfect society. Toward that end, Torah defines for us certain positive and negative behaviors: the many “thou shalts” and “thou shalt nots” of the mitzvot. In addition to acting by the Torah, we are instructed to continually study it and teach it to our children.

Imagine how safe the roads would be if we all reviewed the driving laws on a regular basis, and then, actually complied with them. And how Jewishly meaningful our lives might be if we study Torah and apply it.

That said, this is not a pitch for joining Shir Shalom’s two weekly Zoom Torah study sessions (though if you are interested, you can talk to me afterward or check the links in the congregational newsletter). What I’d like to talk about instead is this: where our idealistic tires meet the experiential roadway. So let’s examine why, despite every good intention, we sometimes “drive off the road.” So to speak.

There is an ancient rabbinic teaching, based on the early chapters of Genesis, that every person has two internal urges clamoring for attention: the yetzer hatov, or urge for good, and the yetzer hara, classically understood as the urge for evil. What’s fascinating is that our sages say the yetzer hara is of extreme importance to us – as a primal drive. Without it, the rabbis say, we wouldn’t go to work, build anything, or have children.

But two relatively modern rabbis cast the yetzer hara in a different light. American Rabbi Harold Kushner views it as “the urge to selfishness.” And 19th-Century European Rabbi Samson Rafael Hirsch describes it as “the urge toward comfort.”

Let’s explore Rabbi Hirsch’s definition more closely.

Unlike some religious or spiritual traditions, Judaism doesn’t pit our souls and our bodies against each other – we balance them. Our sages teach that without the body, the soul would have no way to experience the world. Without the soul, the body would be inert and lifeless. After all, what good is a car without a driver?

While the Jewish soul and body don’t exactly engage in a battle for supremacy, they do have different priorities. The soul aspires toward things that uplift it, like art, music, prayer or meditation, nature hikes, even Torah study. The body, on the other hand, likes to stay put. It seeks gratification in lazing about, and by satisfying its many appetites – egotistical and otherwise. And this behavior, if unchecked, can lead to the aforementioned aveirahs, or line-crossings.

Without teshuvah, it’s easy to get bogged down by the soulless indulgences of the yetzer hara. But Judaism offers a potential remedy: what our sages call “mesirat nefesh.” Literally translated as “soul-sacrifice,” it can also be understood as “self-sacrifice” or “devotion.” Mesirat nefesh keeps soul and body, the yetzer hatov and yetzer hara, in proper equilibrium through a sort of creative affliction.

Those fasting today are already engaging in one form of creative affliction. Other forms might include giving more tzedakah than usual – making sure it hurts a bit. Going out of our way to help our fellow creatures. Studying a page or two of Torah, or listening to an inspiring podcast, when we’d rather veg out in front of a screen.

The point is not to conquer or do away with the yetzer hara, but to keep it balanced with the yetzer hatov – by getting out of our comfort zones often enough to grow. Otherwise, we stagnate – which is the very opposite of teshuvah. To revisit the car-and-driver model, we can be tempted toward, as Pink Floyd sang, “running over the same old ground, year after year.” Never knowing or even guessing what wonderful vistas we’re missing along the highway leading over yonder.

Wherever it goes, let’s all get there safely together. Gut Yontiff – and happy motoring.

Sinchronization (sic)

AS THE HIGH HOLY DAYS approach – a time for an accounting and confession of personal and communal sins – we may rightly ask: “Just what is a sin, anyway?”

Many of us, living as we do in a differently oriented culture, might equate sins with something inherently evil. But the Jewish understanding is rather more nuanced.

Judaism teaches that there are three categories of sinful acts, each described as “aveirahs” (loosely translated as “line-crossings”):

1. Khet: An archery term for missing the mark. Think of it as an inattentive (or ignorant) error.

2. Ahvon: A “just this once” or “what’s the harm?” behavior.

3. Pesha: Knowing what the law/custom/social contract requires, but deliberately breaking it.

If those distinctions aren’t clear enough, try this driving analogy:

1. Khet: Not paying attention to, or not seeing, the stop sign.

2. Ahvon: Seeing the stop sign, but also not seeing any other drivers – and proceeding to drive past it.

3. Pesha: Blowing through the stop sign with a smirking, “they can’t tell ME what to do.”

I hope this illustration helps make clearer our annual pilgrimage to the Day of Atonement. May this season of holy rededication bring increased awareness of What connects us all together – and the strength of responsibility to act accordingly.

Hearing Aid

A message in today’s congregational newsletter. It’s a Jewish thing, but also universal.

Listening.

It’s one of the most important things people can do for each other. It’s so important, in fact, that our Torah teaches us to speak of it – in the Shema – twice daily.

The Hebrew root of “shema” is shin-mem-ayin. In this week’s Torah portion, Eikev, that root surfaces in its doubled/emphatic form (Deuteronomy 11:13) as part of the Shema’s second paragraph.

The word “shema” is usually translated as “hear” or “listen,” and when it’s doubled it means “really listen.” However, there is no single English word that perfectly captures its multiple shades of meaning – which can also include “understand,” “take seriously,” and “hear in order to act.”

“When you encounter a word in any language that is untranslatable into your own,” Rabbi Jonathan Sacks says, “you are close to the beating pulse of that culture. To understand an untranslatable word, you have to move out of your comfort zone and enter a mindset that is significantly different from yours.”

He goes on to define listening as a deeply spiritual act. It can also be painful, since what we hear may sometimes challenge our own worldview. But it’s through meeting that challenge – listening to others who may not agree with us, who may think and feel differently than we’re used to thinking and feeling – that we can open ourselves to growing and developing in ways that might never have occurred to us.

“Listening is the greatest gift we can give to another human being,” Rabbi Sacks concludes. “To be listened to, to be heard, is to know that someone else takes me seriously […] it changes not only the one who is heard, but the listener as well.”

May we all be strong and brave enough to really listen to each other – and to willingly go wherever that listening takes us.

This is Dedicated to the One

HOW CAN WE distill something as complex as Judaism into one simple, straightforward sentence?

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks zt”l makes an interesting observation this week, reminding us of a discussion in the Talmud where three rabbis tried to do just that.

One rabbi sees it as a matter of faith, and offers Deuteronomy 6:4, the Shema – “Hear O Israel, Adonai is our G?d, Adonai is One.” Another frames it in terms of community, citing Leviticus 19:18: “Love your fellow as yourself.” But the rabbi who gets the last word says Judaism’s essence can be found in Numbers 28:4: “Offer one lamb [as a sacrifice] in the morning and the second in the afternoon.”

Rabbi Sacks intimates that living a life of consistent action is our religion’s most important teaching. “Judaism … is not just the fire of romantic love but the daily kindnesses of a successful marriage, not just an exalted faith in the transcendent G?d but the way it takes faith and translates it into everyday life.” May we all strive to carry this essence forward.

Double Identity

IN ADDITION TO what else one may find in a wallet (money, DL, &c.), mine contains two cards that license me as a member of the clergy.

They’re neither what you think – I’m not a rabbi, nor will I likely become one in this life – but they do tell a semi-religious story nonetheless.

The first came c. 1999, after a friend who was a member of the Universal Life Church asked me if I too wanted to be ordained. “Sure! What do I need to do?” I asked him. After anointing my head with a frosty cold one (it was a very hot day, in the way that only Northern California Renaissance Pleasure Faire days can be very hot), he declared, “You’re in.” He then told me where to write and receive my free ordination credentials.

ULC espouses a single creed: “Know your beliefs and be true to them.” And because ULC is legally recognized in California (and other enlightened states) for solemnizing weddings, I have since married a handful of friends – which was, really, why I wanted ordainment in the first place.

The other ordination, also legally recognized in some places, belongs to the Church of the SubGenius. Those behind that inexplicable parody religion/religious parody/living art project published a trade paperback in 1983 which – much like science-fiction conventions and DEVO – assured lonely misfits that they too had a place, and a people, they could call their own. Of course, I took to it in a big, enthusiastic way.

Unlike the ULC, the CotS then charged $20 for an ordination kit. So, justifying it as for a good cause, I mailed a Jackson to their Dallas, Texas headquarters. Within a week I received an ordination card, a poster of Church frontman J. R. “Bob” Dobbs, and various pieces of SubG propaganda (some of which I distributed in the summer of 1985 at 2 a.m. in Times Square – but that story is classified.)

For a long time, my ULC and CotS “ministries” helped me feel as though I belonged somewhere spiritually important. I am grateful to be able to do that now in other ways. But I will always be respectfully grateful to the Revs. Kirby Hensley and Ivan Stang for opening their secretly famous doors and inviting me in.

Portable Holiness

ONE OF THE more mysterious details of this week’s Torah portion, Naso (Numbers 4:21–7:89), concerns the “nazirite” – someone who decides to swear off of wine and other grape products, haircuts, and engaging with the deceased.

Why would anyone do such a thing?

The Torah doesn’t explain, but Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz offers three traditional viewpoints:

1. Out of gratitude for a gift or blessing from G?d.

2. To fulfill a vow to G?d.

3. To draw nearer the Divine by achieving a measure of personal holiness.

That last point takes a bit of unpacking. For our ancestors, closeness to G?d could normally be achieved in only two ways – either through bringing a sacrifice to the Tabernacle or Temple, or by being born into one of the Levitical families who serve in it.

However, not everyone could afford a sacrifice. And while not everyone had the privilege of inheriting a sacred status, anyone could be as holy as someone who did. Being a nazirite took a dedication to principles, vigilance over one’s behavior, and a certain amount of self-sacrifice.

Though there’s no longer a Tabernacle or Temple, we call someone who holds and exemplifies those qualities a “mensch.”

Sounds a lot like holiness to me.

Put Your Hand on the Radio

A RABBINICAL ASSISTANT, two deacons, and a lay mystic walk into a radio studio.

Seriously.

Welcome to the Sonoma Valley Interfaith Radio Hour, a years-old, live and lively round-robin every Thursday afternoon from 3-4pm Pacific Time on Sonoma Valley’s independent station KSVY (91.3 FM and streaming/archived at ksvy.org). It features one Jew (me), the deacons (Presbyterian and Roman Catholic), and a Christian Science practitioner. (With occasional guesting by my rabbi, by an Irish Catholic priest, and by whoever else we can grab from our local ecumenical Cobb salad.)

Our informal discussions cover broad ground: e.g., different faith traditions’ understandings and manifestations of moral and ethical ideals; life-cycle events such as birth, coming of age, marriage and divorce, and dying/mourning; the multiform flavors of our worship services; observing holidays and holy days; encounters with the Bible and other holy books; and how we ourselves each came to our respective “ministries.” We have deep respect for each other’s religious backgrounds and deep attachments to our own – as our Presbyterian emcee puts it, “We’re all swimming in the same direction” – and are on the air not to convert or proselytize, but to educate, enlighten, and (we hope) edify.

What also makes the show work, I think, is that outside of our collegial collective, the Valley prides itself on a thriving interfaith fellowship; we’re so geographically isolated, it’s to our evolutionary advantage to get along as well as we do. It helps, too, that through our long association we have become quite close – itself a byproduct of sharing intensely real conversations every week. And speaking personally, I find that learning about others’ sacred practices makes me understand and appreciate my own that much more. Tune us in and see if that’s true for you!

365 Names: “The Eternal”

THE ETERNAL is one of the many, many translations for יהוה‎ – a mostly untranslatable Hebrew divine moniker or “theonym” (which term I just now learned – thank you, Wikipedia!) connected with a form of the cognate “to be.” It appears in the Torah (Exodus 3:15) right after another theonym, אֶֽהְיֶ֖ה אֲשֶׁ֣ר אֶֽהְיֶ֑ה (“Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh,” or “I Will Be What I Will Be”) in Ex. 3:14, where Moses asks G?d what Name to tell the enslaved Jews who will question his authority to speak on G?d’s behalf. “The Eternal” takes the “to be” ball and runs with it, in the sense/concept of G?d existing forever and ever, outside of spacetime, infinite and unknowable. (We could get all mystical and Qabalistic at this point, nattering on about lofty Ain Sof (transcendence) v. folksy Shekhina (immanence), but let’s save that for another time – no pun intended.)

This is one of my favorite Names for that-which-some-people-call-God: some are creative, others traditional, each unique. If you want to see your favorite here, but haven’t, send it along with the subject line “365 Names” and let us know whether or not you want to be credited.

Time Life

(An adjunct and extension of the previous message, this one is a sermon I delivered Friday night [even though I’m writing this on Friday afternoon] – evidence of Time’s weird curling ways. As always, feel free to skip it if you’re not into this sort of thing.)

TIME. Is it really on our side? According to this week’s Torah portion, that’s all a matter of perspective.

In Exodus 12:2, G?d commands Moses and Aaron: “This month shall be for you the beginning of months; it shall be the first month of the year to you.” Having and marking a calendar was the first mitzvah given to us as a nation, even before we left Egyptian slavery.

Why is that important? Because free people need calendars to arrange their lives – slaves don’t.

In his book The Sabbath: Its Meaning for Modern Man, Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel calls Judaism “a religion of time aiming at the sanctification of time.” But what exactly is time?

On a micro-level, time is a property of the complex and mysterious motions of atoms. Up where we live, however, we need a more useful definition. Enter Rabbi Jonathan Sacks.

Rabbi Sacks tells us that time can be conceived in two ways. The first is “cyclical” or “mythic” time. It’s the time referred to by Ecclesiastes: plants and people and weather and seasons pass from being to nonbeing and back again. This is also the time of Fate and Destiny – unchanging, monotonous, predictable.

The second sort of time Rabbi Sacks describes is “historical” time. This is more random and less predictable than the first: An unknown future flows into the present to become fixed in the past. Anything can happen, and often does.

Jews – optimists and outliers that we are – live by a third type of time. It’s helpful to think of it as “spiral” or “corkscrew” time – the latter an appropriate analogy for the wine-rich Valley of the Moon. Every birthday and anniversary, every holiday and Torah reading finds us having grown just a little bit more. Each recurring event brings us farther along from our humble past and, so our tradition teaches us, that much closer to the promise of a glorious future.

Seen this way, the moments of our lives are more like souvenir stands than destinations, more like crossroads than dead ends. So my question tonight is, “What souvenirs have you collected? In other words, what events or moments helped shape you from the person you were to the person you’re becoming?”

[pass mic]

Thank you, everyone. May your road ahead be familiar enough for comfort, yet unusual enough for exploration. Shabbat shalom.

Favicon Plugin created by Jake Ruston's Wordpress Plugins - Powered by Briefcases and r4 ds card.